Our approach to care

Motivational Interviewing.

We don't tell you to change. We talk with you about change.

If, when, and how you want it.

Motivational Interviewing is the clinical approach behind every conversation at MyStreetHealth. It is not a separate service. It is how we talk with you.

Back to Our Approach

What it is

A conversation, not a lecture.

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a collaborative, person-centered approach developed by William R. Miller and Stephen Rollnick, now in its fourth edition. Its core aim is to strengthen a person's own motivation for change — not to argue for it, not to impose a timeline, and not to create shame around ambivalence.

The clinician's job is to draw out what matters to the person in front of them — not to deliver a predetermined message about what they should do or who they should become.

"Motivational Interviewing is not about arguing for change. It is about exploring a person's own reasons for it, and trusting that they are the expert on their own life."

— Miller & Rollnick, Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change and Grow, 4th ed. (Guilford Press, 2023)

How it connects to Medication First

The visit itself is the support.

Our Medication First approach separates the receipt of buprenorphine from any requirement to attend separate counseling sessions. Motivational Interviewing is why that works clinically. A counseling style that lectures, pressures, or conditions its support is counterproductive. Motivational Interviewing does not do any of those things.

Every appointment at MyStreetHealth includes time to talk — about where you are, what matters to you, what's getting in the way. That conversation follows Motivational Interviewing. You don't opt into it. It's just how we talk with you.

The four processes

How a session moves.

Motivational Interviewing is organized around four processes — not rigid steps, but overlapping activities that recur throughout any conversation about change.

01 — Engaging

Establishing a working relationship built on trust and genuine curiosity. Not an intake checklist.

02 — Focusing

Agreeing on a direction for the conversation. The agenda comes from you, not from us.

03 — Evoking

Drawing out your own reasons for change. Change talk you generate is far more powerful than advice we give.

04 — Planning

When you are ready — building a concrete, self-directed plan at your pace, on your terms.

What Motivational Interviewing is not

To be clear.

Not a requirement for your buprenorphine prescription — medication and this conversation are offered independently

Not a separate group session or a meeting you must attend

Not confrontational — Motivational Interviewing explicitly avoids argumentation and unsolicited advice

Not open-ended therapy — Motivational Interviewing is most effective in brief, focused conversations

Not something you opt into — it is simply how your physician talks with you

The evidence

Three decades of research.

Motivational Interviewing is one of the most rigorously studied behavioral interventions in addiction medicine. A selection of the key literature:

Meta-analysis

Lundahl et al. (2010) — 119 RCTs

Motivational Interviewing produced statistically significant, durable effects on substance use outcomes across 119 controlled trials. Research on Social Work Practice.

Cochrane Review

Smedslund et al. (2011)

59-study Cochrane review. MI reduced substance use compared to no intervention and improved treatment engagement. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Large RCT

COMBINE Study — JAMA (2006)

The largest pharmacotherapy trial for alcohol dependence in the US. MI-based Combined Behavioral Intervention matched naltrexone alone in efficacy. JAMA 2006;295(17):2003–17.

Multi-site RCT

Project MATCH (1997)

1,726-patient trial. Motivational Enhancement Therapy (4 sessions) produced outcomes comparable to 12-session treatments. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1997;58(1):7–29.

Multi-site effectiveness

Carroll et al. (2006)

In a NIDA Clinical Trials Network multi-site study, MI significantly improved treatment retention at 28 days compared to standard care. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006;81(3):301–12.

Federal guideline

SAMHSA TIP 35 — Enhancing Motivation for Change (2019)

Federal treatment improvement protocol designating Motivational Interviewing as best practice for substance use disorder counseling and medication-assisted treatment.

Meta-analysis

Hettema, Steele & Miller (2005)

MI effects held across substance use, HIV risk behavior, diet, and treatment engagement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2005;1:91–111.

Mechanisms review

Miller & Rose (2009)

Analysis of how and why Motivational Interviewing works — relational and technical components, change talk, and therapist effects. American Psychologist 2009;64(6):527–37.

Systematic review

Tait & Hulse (2003)

Systematic review of brief MI-based interventions with adolescent substance users. MI underpinned the majority of effective interventions identified. Drug and Alcohol Review 2003;22(3):337–46.

Medical settings review

Lundahl et al. (2013) — Medical care

48-trial meta-analysis of MI in medical care settings. Significant advantage for MI across HIV, alcohol, tobacco, body weight, and approach to treatment. Patient Education and Counseling.

Meta-analysis

Rubak et al. (2005)

72-trial meta-analysis. MI outperforms traditional advice in a broad range of behavioral problems and diseases. British Journal of General Practice 2005;55(513):305–12.

Foundational text

Miller & Rollnick — 4th ed. (2023)

The authoritative text on Motivational Interviewing. Guilford Press. The primary reference for theory, practice, and evidence base.

Ready to start?

Same-day visits usually available.

(888) 835-9995 · Call or text Schedule online →

Our approach  ·  The science  ·  Is this right for me?  ·  What to expect at your first visit  ·  FAQ

Home Our approach Services Care fees Pay what you can FAQ Science Learn Locations Patient portal Call (888) 835-9995